Mobile phones have lots of pros and cons in our everyday life. This essay will indicate both parts of this devises in recent years. Mobile phones create faster communication and they are useful for entertainment, on the other hand these phones take too much time which reduces face to face relationships. We will support our ideas in the following sentences.
First of all, nowadays, mobile phones is one of the most effective and fastest tools among the modern technologies. It is easy to carry and it takes only gew minutes to connect with a person who is even in a different country. For example, in accordance with the scientifical research carried by Oxford University, since the mobile phones have been invented, the communication rates in work places increased more than 30% than it was before.
Secondly, most of the mobile phones are smart phones and they have various entertainment applications. These applications can be used simply by downloading from the internet. For instance, based on the Wallstreet Journal, 60% of entertaining applications are taken through the net.
On the other hand, mobile phones reduce face to face communication style among the people. They do not need to deliver their ideas with their eye contacts or gestures, they do it only voice message or conservation.
For example, in reagard to the surveys by Khazar University, 70% student used to talk via their mobile phones instead of talking them directly in real conditions.
In conclusion, although mobile phones have adverse impacts on real communication, they are increasing our communication and allow us to spend our leisure time more effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'voices'?
Suggestion: voices
...e contacts or gestures, they do it only voice message or conservation. For example, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20224719101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93700787091 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588014981273 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8493024799 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236713822189 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880348477424 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782693320664 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128085266485 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506791240291 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.