In this contemporary era, hypes are paramount for the promotion of products. In these days, every product from niddle to vehicles are endorsed by famous personalities. Children are direct target of their advertisements. However, families indirectly suffer from this. I strongly agree wit this dogma.
There are multifarious reasons that demonstrate that offsprings as well as their families get affected from the endorsement of products. To commence wish, by seeing promotions, children demand for that things and some are stubborn and want that promoted products at any cost. In some circumstances, parents are not able to afford but they have to fulfill their desires. Probing further, the junk food which is advertised, is not beneficial for their health and because of their child's wish, guardians have to prepare that food, even though they know it is jeopardize for their health. When young people suffer from some kind of ailments because of this spicy food, then wish offsprings, care takers also have to tolerate.
In addition to this, children always prefer to play with the toys that are mostly endorsed in television. These playable things, divert the mind of young ones from their studies. For instance, there is video game which is mostly played by children and they expend their quality of time on this game and pay less attention towards their education which affects on their future.
To sum up, it can be said that, although advertisements are meant for the children only but it puts impact on birth givers as well because, parents are responsible for their children's wishes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'jeopardized'.
Suggestion: jeopardized
... that food, even though they know it is jeopardize for their health. When young people su...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isements are meant for the children only but it puts impact on birth givers as we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, kind of, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17307692308 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66840765407 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1355865885 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0714285714 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905106956497 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296626304353 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330731102839 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557384561987 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224299556012 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.