Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity not in quality. To what extent you agree or disagree.
Advertising has been highlighted as an emerging issue, capturing significant public attention due to its implications on consumers’ behaviours. Given the suggestion that advertisements are destined for sale boost instead of quality promotion. I partially agree.
On the one hand, It is true that advertising promotes sales. First, products promoted are usually associated with the false portrayals and the exaggeration of the genuine quality. This would act as an incentive for customers’ desire for purchasing such items, thereby increasing profits for manufacturers. Second, since in many nations, especially developing ones, high-end items suggest a correlation with better socio-economic status, many companies have featured this notion into their advertisements for marketing purposes. For example, if apparel brands offer a new line of exorbitant garments with the sale-targeting advertisements that these are exclusive to the elite class, many individuals even those with low purchasing powers would purchase such items to falsely show off their social position without any attention to the functionality or quality.
On the other hand, it must be acknowledged that advertising reflect products’ quality. In order to address the implications of many falsely displayed products, which would otherwise culminate in irreversible impacts on human health, many official authorities have enacted regulations, providing guideline for the advertising the true quality of products related to pharmaceuticals, cigarettes, supplements… Without these governmental enforcement, customers would be misled, making substance abuse and excessive consumption inevitable products.
In conclusion, I belive that advertising mainly aims at sale increase but sometimes it also reflect the quality of items. However, for the betterment of consumption behaviours, enterprises should promote the quality of advertising content.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reflects'?
Suggestion: reflects
... at sale increase but sometimes it also reflect the quality of items. However, for the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23134328358 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44758350644 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65671641791 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.986816589 49.4020404114 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109941835837 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464704785866 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0237976223685 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695240388288 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00952760143412 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 50.2224549098 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.15 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.