Nowadays, in accordance to its quickness and affordability of ticket price to general community, aircraft transportation is used frequently. However, air traffic causing environmental pollution and loud noise, which annoys people. Personally, I disagree with solution of such issue by enlarging taxes, since such decision may lead to various inevitable drawbacks. Hence, the current essay will support my standpoint with relevant examples.
Firstly, the price of tickets become more expensive corresponding from increased tax rates and the preference of people in travelling might change. Therefore, in travelling to short distances, for instance from one European country to another, individuals would choose to take a train or a bus. As the result of this, aircraft organizations lessen their staff and services, which may lead to increase of unemployment and reduce of commodities available for people. Moreover, there would be more noise and pollution on the roads as the consequence of this.
On the other hand, excessive air traffic, obviously, affects environment negatively. The planes produce harmful gas that pollutes the environment. In addition, it is commonly seen that humans cannot bear the noise coming from planes. Subsequently, increasing taxes for aircraft companies would compensate the harm they make to the environment.
However, high cost of flight tickets according to high taxation would certainly discourage ordinary people to travel and discriminate them economically, as only wealthy ones would be able to afford it. Furthermore, such excessive travel costs would evidently discourage tourists to travel to that particular country, which negatively result in cultural and economic exchange between countries. As a consequence, this may lead to loss in economic and tourism manner.
In conclusion, considering possible negative outcomes from high taxation on plane tickets, this cannot be convenient solution against noise and air pollution, since air transportation is vital in trading and, developments and tourism communication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83498349835 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1348271292 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630363036304 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3163081051 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179248750517 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545775253814 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466850687311 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937845315799 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248162405063 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.