Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxi

Today, airline ticket price is low to attract more passengers. Moreover, air traffic contributes a lot of money to domestic economy, so government always try to develop this industry. There is an opinion that environmental pollution will increase sharply by air traffic. I do not agree with this opinion and this essay will explain the reason.

Firstly, lower ticket will help a lot of people use air plane for travel or work, and it saves more time for them. Government collects tax not only airline tickets but also travel services. Economy will develop quickly thanks to the growth of tourism. Besides, airlines invest air planes with high quality to compete when their business make more money. It means that these air planes create less noise and emission. For instance, Vietjet corporation in Vietnam has more air planes with bad quality when it is new established. However, after several years, all of the facilities have more changed. They can buy good air planes which have less noise and emissions because revenue grows quickly by selling low price airline ticket.

Secondly, the environment can be more polluted when passengers use different transports, such as private cars, coaches and trains. All of them make a lot of noise and emit toxic emissions. Moreover, air planes have capacity to carry many people, so this transport is very effective to service at low cost. Traffic jams are also reduced because the number of cars on streets decrease. Customers always choose the way of travel which should be comfortable and convenient. The role of government is very important to support population using any transports to be suitable for them.

In conclusion, air traffic is a good choice if airlines develop their facilities with high quality. Government should balance between population's benefit and environmental pollution problem.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ablished. However, after several years, all of the facilities have more changed. They can ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20735785953 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63348567669 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.429895433 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.85 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.95 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284585607988 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814447106388 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507862959185 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18037887043 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479652589893 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.