Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree?

At earlier decades, news papers were the only news source that people could relay on, yet, after the internet revolutionary changes to all aspects of life, especially those related to media, I clearly denote that Internet sourced news will put news papers in to distinction, and in the following essay I will explain why I do believe in that.
Many people of earlier generations are even emotionally attached to the act of " Reading the news paper" as an every morning habit, and they perceive the news papers as the most reliable & trustworthy source of news in contrast to those Internet sourced as they consider it doubtful and carries varied contradicting speculations that reinforces their doubts.
On the other hand, More recent generations- who I conclude my self as one of them- consider that variaty of internet sourced news as a source of richness & an apportunity to develop our own reasoning of the news & identifying it's truth Ness. Another huge advantage of internet sourced news is its' fastness as it can be considered as "live" play of the news, which is in my opinion the advantage that outweigh any other claimed advantages of news papers.
In conclusion, I can see clearly , that the most important future source of news is the Internet & I totally disagree with opposite proposed notion. As Internet sourced news proved to be fast , offering variaty that supports truth than that single point of news offered by news papers.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...apers. In conclusion, I can see clearly , that the most important future source o...
^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Internet sourced news proved to be fast , offering variaty that supports truth th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04132231405 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83503014829 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570247933884 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.2975951904 197% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.9273690168 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 203.333333333 106.682146367 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.3333333333 20.7667163134 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411722566616 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217220719649 0.084324248473 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358395119212 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255444017272 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326683595922 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.0946893788 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.88 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.84 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 9.78957915832 286% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.1190380762 178% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 10.7795591182 260% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.