Some people are of the view that the mean of wellbeing people’s benchmark will anticipate to below in the future than the present day. On the contrary, others debate that the average healthy people will be probably higher in the future than the current year. This essay will elaborate the healthy people will reduce significantly in the future; indeed, however, the increasing of the healthy people in the future cannot be ignored and both will provide to the well-weighed conclusion.
A number of people agree that the reducing of the people’s physical health in the future will concern considerably for various reasons. First of all, the environmental impact of the pollution effect to many people that is catastrophic to their inter bodies, typically on the air respiration, this issue will receive the infectious diseases, such as COVIC 19 and lung cancer. For example, in Bangkok, many people who live in the condensed city invariably get a cough symptom. Second of all, people will not recognize to consume some junk food and highly cholesterol and sugary meals that those ingredients will gradually destroy people’s health. For example, there are many junk food and sugary ingredients in Thailand in the milk tea. Therefore, it is undoubtedly a vital time for people to focus on decreasing in people’s good health in the future rather than assuming the people’s health will increase in the future.
Nevertheless, many people choose to think differently and hold opposing the wellbeing people in the future will increase in the better life. Many scientific medication and researchers have been developing the technical tools and medicines so far to save the people to be a human longevity, such as vaccine, medical technology in operation and diagnosis. Furthermore, people activate the healthy body to join a fitness club.
In conclusion, the average of people’s health in the future has both its positives and its negative issues. In my opinion, the infectious disease will concern remarkably that it is unpredictable events.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun junk seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much junk', 'a good deal of junk'.
Suggestion: much junk; a good deal of junk
...people’s health. For example, there are many junk food and sugary ingredients in Thailand...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23404255319 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85012071167 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51367781155 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7941864991 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248092041218 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104374975145 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772899938091 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159982133716 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369523423251 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.