Traffic congestion is an alarming issue in large cities and metropolitans. A school of thought argues that 24/7 public transport is the key to addressing this pressing concern. From my perspective, I partly agree with this idea because there are several measures that can be taken to improve the traffic situation nowadays.
It is understandable why many people contend the best way to combat traffic congestion is by providing free public transport. The most highlighted reason is the huge capacity of this type of vehicle. For example, a normal bus can take up to 40 passengers, which is nearly eightfold as much as a car. If commuting to work by personal vehicle can convert into the public one, the number of transport traveling on the road will significantly reduce. Additionally, free bus ticket also plays an important role in the using decision of citizens. Despite the convenience and usefulness of individual vehicles, people have to take a consideration regarding cost, including the insurance vehicle fee, regular repairing fee, and fuel costs, which account for a relatively large in their monthly expense. Therefore, using public transport is the best way to minimize people's budget, especially for the poor and low-salary employees.
Despite these arguments mentioned above, I strongly believe that besides public transport, governments can apply other solutions which bring relevant benefits. Firstly, the boost in the appearance of traffic lights and police agents in the main road lines and densely-populated regions has a positive influence on traffic congestion. Under the adjustment and heavy fine, typically confiscation, this kind of measure acts as a deterrent in the traffic participants' consciousness, which makes them strictly follow the traffic rule and contributes to decreasing traffic incidents in rush hours. Furthermore, applying a suitable working time schedule in each type of company to reallocate traffic flow might bring equivalent effects.
In conclusion, I would argue that governments can take numerous effective ways to solve traffic problems
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49068322981 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06762508723 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636645962733 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0755027716 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231922018487 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763035397276 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689675675742 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138877964876 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318020332748 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.