The best way to reduce the number of traffic accidents is to raise the age limit for the younger drivers and to lower age limit for the aged ones. Do you agree?
It is sometimes argued that the age group of drivers should be limited to diminish the rate of traffic accidents. While I agree with this compulsory for participants transportation, I do not believe that this is the effective way to restrict the traffic congestion.
On the one hand, I absolutely think that the driving age should be raised. Firstly, many teenagers are too immature to drive alone because they often have a superiority complex and often increase speed to be faster than one another. For example, in my country, the rule for young drivers is not strict so there are speed competitions which lead to accidents. Consequently, the accident is always caused by these age groups. Secondly, because of health issues, lowing age limit for the old people is suitable. For instance, the aged ones often have Alzheimer; it can be jeopardized for them to drive vehicles such as forgetting the way to go home. Therefore, it is safer to reduce the age limit for the older ones.
However, the aforementioned reasons can be seen as the opposite angle. One reason is the age matter is not solely for traffic accidents, the awareness should be considered. Many people do not often have concentration and observation, all this happen to people of all ages, so age is not the cause of the crashes. Another reason is teenagers should be taught to drive vehicles to get around independently and have a job. For example, a lot of students help their families by running errands and helping to make ends meet. As a result, a better time for teens to start driving might not exist and rising that age would be disadvantageous for many people.
In conclusion, while there are many drawbacks to solve age matters for drivers, I do believe that this is a necessary rule.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81907894737 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81106457676 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529605263158 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6884210383 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383956833586 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143613496775 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104526581104 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247299574957 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071662779774 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.