The best way to remove poverty in developing countries to provide 6years of free education to all children so that they can read write and use numbers. Do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, education is necessary for all students in the country. While some people think that providing six years of education at free of cost to all children so they can become more aware of reading, write, and numbers, others do not believe it would be one of the best ways. This essay will discuss why people feel that it is an efficient way and why I disagree with the given statement.
If the government provides free education to all children in the country for six years, it will improve the education rate and children become better in the order to at reading, writing, and maths. When children become more educated, they will help to reduce poverty in a country. The higher authority of Pakistan, for example, made decisions to give free education to their children of standard one to six in 2019. Since the authority applied these rules, over 80% of pupils known many abilities such as reading, writing, and calculation of numbers until 2020. Therefore, these types of evidence prove that giving free education may one of the best ways to tackle poverty, unemployment rates, and enhance economic growth in the long run.
However, a six-year free education could not be an effective way, because it may only helpful for children, not adults. If governments try to aware all citizens about higher education and jobs, which may create many positive impacts then citizens become more responsible. For instance, while citizens become familiar with the importance of studying in life, they send their children to schools as per their financial balances, whereas they also start to do jobs, which will be beneficial for the economy and society. Indeed, many possible ways are more effective than free education policy because it creates many impacts.
To conclude, although governments started free education policies for children that would be beneficial, it is not an effective way in terms of economic growth for a nation. In my words, if the government takes responsible steps to avoid short terms problems, it may be beneficial for all.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00290697674 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56692301538 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7278103159 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269717659832 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097593651642 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632929070533 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171529246263 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661011396715 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.