The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that there are always various different opinions spinning around environmental issues every day. Some people believe that an increased cost of fuel is would address these global problems most effectively. However, I think in addition to the tax, people can approach the environment related concerns by other ways.
On the one hand, I completely agree that an increased fuel tax will measure problems of the environment. In fact, the vast majority of vehicles nowadays are using fuel to run the motor, which directly leads to releasing a huge amount of greenhouse emissions to the atmosphere and causes global warming. Hence, a reduction of consuming fuel would contribute to solving not only global warming but also other impacts such as rising sea level, the distinction of wild animals and health human. This forces people to diminish the number of private vehicles travelling on the road as well as to put an effort in manufacturing friendly-environmental means of transport in order to protect the environment.
Although this tax policy is justifiable, I am convinced that the government also focus on raising the public’s awareness to tackle environmental issues. Firstly, people should be educated that using fuel is just single reason amongst various important reasons that damage the environment. Human’s activities such as exploiting natural resources or releasing toxic waste into water resources are also severe issues that need addressing. Therefore, people should learn to balance their needs and conservation of the environment. They also educate the next generations to preserve the natural habitat.
In conclusion, the fuel tax is a practical policy to cope with the contemporary environmental issues. However, I believe there will be better measurements for the problems, but they need carrying out step by step, including the educating people.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y step, including the educating people.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40063091483 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11393379918 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8221746879 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326625087736 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1214797334 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185395747491 0.0667982634062 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273367635845 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.364960255366 0.056905535591 641% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.