The best way to solve the world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the consumption of too much fossil fuel will terribly affect the environment around the world. It is thought that this is a serious problem and I partially agree with this view that the best way to solve that increases the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles.
On the one hand, the world’s environmental problem can be solved by raising transport costs. First of all, if the prices of petroleum are increased, it will reduce the consumption of fuel level and carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles to the environment. In addition, the heavy tax on fuel make people use public transport or cycling more than driving, that’s why it will help limit emissions and the environment will become more fresher and greener. For instance, in England, a scientist named Thomas Parker invented a cost-effective and greener means of transportation, which is an electric car. This invention improves the global awareness campaign and solves a limited part of the problem of environmental pollution.
On the other hand, the degradation of using petrol by citizens are essential to serve commuting, that’s why the increase in gasoline prices for cars and other vehicles will adversely affect daily life as well as cultivating and manufacturing methods. For example, people have to spend more money to buy petrol, so the distance and frequency at which people travel on the road are not much. Therefore, each individual has to be self-aware that the consumption of gasoline will cause a severe environment.
In conclusion, the increased cost on fuel will be making the public and enterprises aware of these issues so I completely agree with this ideal solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'fresher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: fresher
...issions and the environment will become more fresher and greener. For instance, in England, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12454212454 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90123764792 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3976424694 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.181818182 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311533904466 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115696383195 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959399518382 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19555963224 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911234470236 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.