The best way to solve the world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It goes without saying that polluted ecosystems are one of the most crucial issues facing us today. Therefore, it is suggested that the best solution to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase fuel prices of cars and other means of transport. I partially agree with this view and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.
First of all, it is worth considering the matters of environmental pollution caused by more and more people using vehicles related to gasoline and oil such as cars and motorbikes. When the price of petrol increases, it is possible to reduce the problem of air pollution and harmful fumes in big cities because the percentage of people using private vehicles decreases. However, this does not bring much benefit because of the fact that today many households can still afford to pay for their car and they still use it regularly. As a result, the conduct of rising fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues, even affecting the national economy.
Besides, some individuals think that we should use renewable sources of energy instead of depending on fossil fuels. The governments should invest more in the installation of solar panels and wind turbines which do not pollute the environment and provide a huge source of energy for consumers. In addition, encourage the implementation of the global awareness campaign so that citizens are more aware of environmental protection, use cost-effective and greener means of transportation such as electric bicycles, electric scooters.
Taking everything into consideration, I find that the advantages of using renewable energy sources outweigh the disadvantages of increasing the cost of fossil fuel for vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...wever, this does not bring much benefit because of the fact that today many households can still afford ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, so, still, therefore, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29032258065 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01663957669 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616487455197 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9073306715 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.181818182 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236408306477 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082410248948 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966103367548 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136098330891 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615227620578 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.