The best way to solve the world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It goes without saying that polluted ecosystems are one of the most crucial issues facing us today. Therefore, it is suggested that the best solution to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase fuel prices of cars and other means of transport. I partially agree with this view and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.
First of all, it is worth considering the matters of environmental pollution caused by more and more people using vehicles related to gasoline and oil such as cars and motorbikes. It cannot be denied that the higher the price of petrol is, the less percentage of people using private vehicles is. Therefore it is possible to reduce the problem of air pollution and harmful fumes in big cities. However, this does not bring much benefit because of the fact that today many households can still afford to pay for their car and they still use it regularly. As a result, the conduct of rising fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues, even affecting the national economy.
Besides, some individuals think that we should use renewable sources of energy instead of depending on fossil fuels. The governments should invest more in the installation of solar panels and wind turbines which do not pollute the environment and provide a huge source of energy for consumers. In addition, encourage the implementation of the global awareness campaign so that citizens are more aware of environmental protection, use cost-effective and greener means of transportation such as electric bicycles, electric scooters.
In conclusion, taking everything into consideration, I find that the advantages of using renewable energy sources outweigh the disadvantages of increasing the cost of fossil fuel for vehicles. Not until people are aware of this worst situation, will this problem be solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ge of people using private vehicles is. Therefore it is possible to reduce the problem of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...wever, this does not bring much benefit because of the fact that today many households can still afford ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20529801325 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96466183081 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599337748344 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7206979865 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.923076923 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228687320881 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730364954306 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909817146962 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133428521793 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621032877306 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.