The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to decrease the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniably true that the contamination of our environment at such an alarming rate is demanding humans to take practical measures. While I accept that a rise in fuels’ prices can alleviate environmental problems, I believe a range of other solutions can be used to address this complex issue.
On the one hand, an upward trend in the cost of traditional energies can allow people to deal with ecological degradation. From a societal perspective, gas emissions from factories as well as exhaust fumes from personal vehicles are two main factors aggravating environmental issues. If the prices of fossil fuels, which are the primary source of these toxic fumes, see a dramatic increase, industries will face the scarcity of fuels and materials by a virtue of the incapability to pay for the high cost. As a result, they have to seek for alternative energies such as wind, hydro and solar power which are eco-friendly and renewable. In the long run, the reduction in fossil fuels’ use due to high commercial value can contribute effectively to the conservation and recovery of natural resources and prevent them from dwindling shortly.
On the other hand, I believe that the major deterioration of environment can be solved by a number of ways. Government could imply educational schemes and this should be done in workplaces as well as schools in the form of extracurricular activities. In this way, governments can raise the public ecological consciousness. Moreover, strict legislations could be introduced to deter people from engaging in unlawful actions that damage the environment such as dumping waste into the sea or release pollutants into the atmosphere.
In conclusion, as the problems are on our doorstep, it seems to me that the rise in fuels’ prices together with other measures should be taken to mitigate ecological issues..
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is undeniably true that the contamination of our environment at ...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...d be taken to mitigate ecological issues..
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21594684385 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14032755554 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.7040851546 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113674234888 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390007874714 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431977658089 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772823785611 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035802385247 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.