The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree?
Global environmental problems, at the turn of 21st century, has been widely experienced in different forms such as glacier melting and the greenhouse effect. Some people argue that an appropriate solution is raising fuel prices. I agree with this viewpoint, but there should be some limits.
It is an undeniable that fuels are used by most vehicles, ranging public transport to personal uses. Hence, a potential solution is increasing cost of petrol, including benzene, diesel and kerosene, which could be the chain effect minimizing amount of released exhaust. Secondly, there is reducing car uses which decline consumption of natural resources as deforesting green areas for factories’ construction. Besides, current traffic would less intense as compared with the past and logistic system could flow fluently. However, authorities should classify automobiles and then set the proper price of gasoline. Because, industrial use definitely higher than others, then they have to cost expensively.
On the other hand, this remedy could suddenly affect to employment. For instance, many companies would fire vast number of drivers in order to cope with multiplying fuel price. Moreover, oil and gas production are probably impacted and have to face canceling investment from foreigners. There is less confident in other businesses to continue their production-related in country which imposed this serious solution and turn to our neighbor areas.
In conclusion, following settlement as mentioned above. The government should address in the way which not critically influence to its people and economy. As far as I am concerned, all citizens might think they are forced to go along with this plan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olution and turn to our neighbor areas. In conclusion, following settlement as m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54789272031 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96418535141 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708812260536 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3519809291 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0624686498303 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0169116097933 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228363936052 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0331425167579 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225978657886 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.