The best way to solve world’s traffic and environmental problems is increase the cost of fuel.
Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?
The issues of the worldwide environment have been heated up in recent years. Many people suppose that raising the fuel price is the most effective solution. Personally, I am not of the notion that it would be the best way to tackle environmental problems.
it is obvious that there are more useful ways to reduce the negative impacts on the environment. The local authorities should implement transportation policies in mitigating privates vehicle in some specific roads. Besides, the government is likely to raise the awareness of citizens about the importance of environmental protection. They will make sense of using some better and more suitable modes of transport. For instance, bicycles or subways are not only the best choices in solving global environmental problems, but it also makes a great contribution to save energy resources. To illustrate, many countries have developed subway systems at a reasonable price to encourage people to travel by this kind of transportation. Moreover, vehicle taxes should be implemented to reduce the quantitive of people commuting by private cars, trucks and so forth.
However, it can not be denied that an increase in fuel costs is also a good method in order to address the environmental problems. This enables to cut down on a large number of car users. Hence, the exhaust emissions significantly mitigate.
In conclusion, despite that fact that increasing fuel price would have some positive effects on dealing with global problems. There are more effective ways needs to be taken into account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...y to tackle environmental problems. it is obvious that there are more useful w...
^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ironmental problems, but it also makes a great contribution to save energy resour...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...l problems. This enables to cut down on a large number of car users. Hence, the exhaust emissions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27016129032 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99381244925 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6599993398 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133134881328 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416579529805 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468999139651 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840370162999 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123417412208 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.