Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now “one big traffic jam”. How true do you think this statement is?
What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars.
Recent decades have observed an enormous rise in car ownership, raising many questions of its ramifications on societies. Given that this pattern is currently causing traffic congestion in many municipalities, official authorities shoud undetake initiatives to address this issue.
It is true that traffic jam is major problem cities have to grapple with. First, insufficient public disbursements on transportation infrastructure would culminate in the deteriorations of bridges, superhighways and the installments of modern ones. This is proved to easily congest the flow of vehicles, making bottleneck an inevitable product. Second, since car is an automobile vehicle, physical exertion required is no longer needed, enabling easier mobility. It is impied that automobile dependency would rise among commuters, leading to higher possibiliies of traffic congestion.
However, there are many measures governments should take to prevent this issue. First, the legislation of imposing higher tariffs on cars and car components should be enacted. It is proved that taxation would raise the car prices, hindering car accessibility among the middle class, which consitutes the large chunk of the population. In addition, official authorites should organize campaigns, raising citizens’ awareness of cars’ environmental costs. Consequently, individuals would use public transportation as an alternative, limiting the risks of higher carbon concentrations and traffic congestion.
In conclusion, traffic gridlock stemming from increased car ownership is stifling the development of many areas especicially metropolises. However, by imposing stricter tax policy on car import and creating social campaigns related to cars’ environmental impacts, the issue could be easily combatted.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.212 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37610663339 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3815394844 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205448585372 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070326428087 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494379500144 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12169234459 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339692943239 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.44 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.