Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples

Essay topics:

Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.

It is widely believed that a course on how to take care of children should be compulsory for all couples who want to have offspring. I completely agree with this statement for the reasons explained below.
To begin with, being a parent is a lifetime job and a big responsibility. This is mainly because to bear this responsibility, parents need to have adequate knowledge and practical skills. Taking care of a baby, for instance, needs profound insight and skills as the baby is a delicate being, and if parents make wrong moves, there is a higher chance for the baby to get hurt. Thus, by attending childcare training courses before having a baby, the parents will be equipped with important insights and essential skills on how to handle their babies in the future as well as how to provide maximum care for their children.
Secondly, this course not only provides information related to how to nurse infants but also additional skills, such as how to communicate with the children according to their ages. Many parents fail to have good communication with their children as they do not possess adequate communication ability and are not well-informed about the significance of the parent-child communication process, resulting in misunderstandings between parents and their children. In the long term, this may lead to loose bonding among family members.
To sum up, attending childcare courses should be compulsory for couples who are going to have babies as this educational process is highly beneficial for the parents and their children.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ren. In the long term, this may lead to loose bonding among family members. To sum u...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09842519685 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96141774155 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566929133858 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7668259275 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263415900861 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119303986861 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572296408418 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18647642249 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517874933986 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.