Children are suggested to study from Televisions. However, some people agree that other sources can be the best media for them to learn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people argue that it is preferable to study from the TV whereas other people believe that it is better to learn from other media. It is true that children are able to receive such information to improve their education. However, other sources such as YouTube are more interesting for them as a medium to learn.
Many people believe that when kids are studying from the Television that can easily absorb knowledge because the media support the attract visualization and many education programs are tend to provide for making them easy to digest the subject. That is to say, children might often get bored when they only read a book to find any information because they just see the text without any additional information. As a result, television can help them to get more motivation for study as it has many creative ways to attract the audience. For example, Who Wants To Be A Millionaire's program is the best channel for education in 2017 in Indonesia because it directly gives general knowledge that is not widely known to many people, and it literally useful for children. However, learning on television is quite hard for them because the program is not repeated and just shown at that moment.
On the other hand, learning on the Internet especially on YouTube is interesting for children who want to see many various channels that can provide them to learn directly. This is because, they do not have to worry when the video is too fast because it can be repeated over and over again, and they can watch every time in every situation, so using that media is very convenient. For instance, Wild Animal's channel on YouTube got more than 5 million subscribers, and most of that from ages 8-12 because their videos telling about endangered animals can provide many kids to inform more about that issues, so children can receive benefit knowledge from that video.
Therefore, watching on YouTube is really impressive because it can be connecting with the author so they can discuss the material that they really want to know.
In conclusion, In spite of using Television for the study is a boon because of the creative program, I believe other media such as YouTube is more beneficial due to can watch repeated. Where possible, children should combine their time for watching on YouTube with the Television one because beneficial information can adapt from any medium.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...orb knowledge because the media support the attract visualization and many education progra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...ization and many education programs are tend to provide for making them easy to dige...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, really, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of, it is true, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54655658976 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456790123457 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0085800358 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.428571429 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333372158264 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13375235404 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681113693698 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198607396491 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738307796413 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.