It is a fact that, today majority of children learn a considerable amount through television. Due to this, it is argued that children should be allowed to watch television at home and school without restriction. I completely disagree with his view, because allowing children, the reasons for which will be enumerated in this essay.
Firstly, allowing young ones to watch TV regularly at home will have negative impacts. If they are allowed to do this, they will become addicted to TV programs. In other words, children who spend a great deal of time infront of TV will be unable to socialise with their family and peers, thus undermining their interpersonal skills. For example, a study conducted by the Oxford University press in 2018 found out that, majority of children around the world are too lazy to mingle with others and the the reason for this is TV addiction. Moreover, sitting infront of TV will lead to health problems such as obesity and inadequate development.
Secondly, allowing children to watch TV at school will not be a good idea. This is because, students will underperform academically of they are allowed to do this. A lot of effort is needed to succeed academically in schools, to be more presice, children should work hard and they should put all their concentration on studying. But this will not be possible if they are watching television at school. To illustrate, a student who watch TV regularly at school will show no interest in doing his/her academic works and inturn this will affect their marks.
In conclusion, I believe that allowing young ones to watch TV at home and school will have a negative impact because, it will make them underperform both academically and socially.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s argued that children should be allowed to watch television at home and school w...
^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... are too lazy to mingle with others and the the reason for this is TV addiction. Moreov...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... are too lazy to mingle with others and the the reason for this is TV addiction. Moreov...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95847750865 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79520531178 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532871972318 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9520971905 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287216388186 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132178482333 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960802728635 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205045853318 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950712515584 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.