Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
The idea that whether governmental financial assistance for children’s education should be promoted remains a source of controversy in the field of education. While this trend is advantagenous in some aspects, I firmly claim that the benefits are more significant.
On the one hand, providing finacial support for children’s education has been some adverse effects on society. Firstly, if students do not have to pay the education cost, they could not try to get high academic achievement. These students, as consequence, may become unprofessional people for community in the future. Secondly, the allocating budget of government to children’s education can lead to an improvement in the rate of illegal immigrations which can creates an ongoing security threat. The noticeable reason of this is that parents often believe that this policy would provide their children with a great education system whilst they do not pay expenditure on education for them.
On the other hand, I extremely argued that there are more significant benefits to promoting government to invest money in children’s education. The primary reason is that this activity may creats the fairness of studying in community. An exellent explaination is that students from all financial backgrounds may have equal access to education. Another reason why the government should pay the costs for children’s education is that the financial support of the government can be conductive to the economic development of family. This is because parents are relieved from the burden of spending money on children’s education. The single parents, for example, can give their children an opportnity to study in a good education environment although they can not be rich people.
In conclusion, although the payment cost of the government to children’s education is unbenefical in few aspects, including losing students’ motivation for learning, I am of the opinion that this action is associated with many advantages, such as equal education opportunities for pupils from all fiancial conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nefical in few aspects, including losing students' motivation for learning, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.3376753507 336% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59433962264 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33929246612 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9934757301 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.071428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261269802728 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931441863209 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567257020509 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167997519999 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376147262591 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.