Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages ?
Young generation’s schooling is extremely notable for their future and country’s development, so in several nations, the government defrays a part or all of the fees in school. Although this deed has both benefits and downsides to people, I believe that its foreseeable advantages outstrip the drawbacks.
Settling costs of studying for children might have some detriments for both nation and citizens. Initially, it might be residents’ reliance on government fund about their children’s learning. As a result, they would be lack of responsibility on their offspring’ s education. For instance, due to the fees are settled, parents would ignore the study of their children and suppose that it is the government’s obligation. Furthermore, they are a great number of urgent issues which should be solved by the national funds. To explain, the country still has to concentrate on other problems such as poverty, homelessness, disease, among other examples and invest money in infrastructure to improve citizens’ life.
Despite above considerations, these drawbacks are eclipsed by potential advantages. Firstly, all children would have opportunities to experience a better education from an early age. In some developing countries, especially the poor families, parents could not afford the school’s fee; therefore, their children have to study at home without tutors or even have a labor work to aid their family. This leads to an increase in the illiterate rate and decrease in citizens’ living conditions. In addition, investing in young generation’s study would herald government’s fore-sighted vision. The young talents are the future generations of nation, so augmenting their academic background is an essential deed for the country’s advancement.
In conclusion, although there are some drawbacks of defraying the cost in studying for pupils, I am convinced that its benefits preponderate over the disadvantages. It generates an equality in learning for children and become a decisive deed for country’s development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79220779221 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.61596784801 2.80592935109 129% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8327380909 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219482661204 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723667227211 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435503940736 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139336374568 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182017744894 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.