In the past, due to high levels of infant mortality and the unavailability of birth control methods, families stonded to be extensive. Recently there has been a marked reduction in the number of babies borne. The percentage of children who are growing up without siblings is definitely on the rise and leading experts have suggested that this trend could be damaging. However, I find Ji the proposal to offers a finemcial incentive for persents to have extra childben quite facebookly appalling and abhorrent.
The flost point worth molking is that even if it could be proved b that those who who grow up Suosounded by siblings are more in mature and butter adapted to society, it does not naturally follow that society would be heatheir if everyone had this background. Variety is necessary in order for a culture to be harmonious and successful. Even though those from those from large families might have better communication skills, only children other abilities like deter minations independence or higher levels of levels of concentration. It is It is precisely the Interaction of individuals with different strengths, weaknesses and character traits which makes makes society stronger.
In addition, it could be argued that this policy would have several! unfortunate unfortunate consequences. Perrents who only wanted child might be attracted by the possibility of rell receiving a payment for a secondi ones resulting in unwanted and unloved beebies being born. Furthermore, revenie wasted on this strategy could not be used to fight poverty or build infrastructures Finally, childt childless couples may resent public funds being used to incentivise others to produce more babies.
In conclusion, I see absolutely no benefits to paying parents to increase to increase the size of their family. I would be upset if any government attempted. to implement this approach. It would suggest to me that the political leaders concerned did not klon have a fundamental grasp of how the world works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: who
...even if it could be proved b that those who who grow up Suosounded by siblings are more...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'those from'.
Suggestion: those from
... harmonious and successful. Even though those from those from large families might have better commun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'levels of'.
Suggestion: levels of
... deter minations independence or higher levels of levels of concentration. It is It is precisely th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'It is'.
Suggestion: It is
...gher levels of levels of concentration. It is It is precisely the Interaction of individual...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: makes
..., weaknesses and character traits which makes makes society stronger. In addition, it co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unfortunate
...ed that this policy would have several! unfortunate unfortunate consequences. Perrents who ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: unfortunate
...ed that this policy would have several! unfortunate unfortunate consequences. Perrents who only wanted ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to increase'.
Suggestion: to increase
...bsolutely no benefits to paying parents to increase to increase the size of their family. I would be up...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...d be upset if any government attempted. to implement this approach. It would sugge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27102803738 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9498909374 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4804756723 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140778018265 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461932689193 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430599958078 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893206999352 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248422674693 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.