Commuication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic. Some people think that this will be the deatah of grammar and spelling. Do you agree or disagree?
In this digital world, thanks to the rapid growth of technology, there is no denying that text messaging and other instantaneous genres of communications have an indispensable part to play in our everyday lives. Nonetheless, it is argued that this will lead to the extinction of grammar and spelling. In my perspective, I totally disagree with this motion.
To commence with, people always have to use formal languages in studying and working, which makes a great contribution to hinder the grammar and spelling being destroyed. In school, students are required to use and organize their vocabulary in the most positive and comprehensible way in order to convey their ideas as succinct as possible in their essay and exams. Not only students but also adults still find correct spelling a crucial part of their life. In this digital era, on the grounds that people always send their CV, emails and other types of online messages to their employers and coworkers every day, it is highly unlikely that they will not be capable of remembering how to take dictation in correct spelling.
In addition to that, the exposure ad usage of text massaging by means of abbreviation have been proved to exert a positive impact on the development of reading comprehension of youngsters. It is undeniable that students become more adept at abbreviating and understanding short-written messages, which can help to boost their literacy, enhance their writing and reading skills and thereby, result in their better performance at academic studying. For instance, a British survey conducted a few years ago has shown that those who scored higher at reading and vocabulary texting have the propensity to use abbreviations while texting online.
To recapitulate, I whole heartedly disagree that online communication can lead to the destruction of our original grammar and spelling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, I totally disagree with this motion. To commence with, people always have to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'messaging'?
Suggestion: messaging
... to that, the exposure ad usage of text massaging by means of abbreviation have been prov...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, so, still, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2508361204 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00263304324 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.381145714 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.727272727 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198085388898 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798681308534 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657777053684 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134239697128 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629701458583 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.