Compare and contrast the culture of small towns and cities.
In a shrinking world, it has become vitally important to recognize and comprehend the concepts of both rural and urban areas once seen as changeable. Improvements in technology and long-distance transportation, along with the rise of the national economy have created a need to identify how society, customs, or even the environment of small towns may be similar or different from cities. Indeed, even though two types of place may differ significantly, frequently enough similarities exist to enable each culture’s representatives to find common ground. The rural and urban areas provide a good example of places that entail a lavish lifestyle and have fundamental differences but that still find commonalities.
As many people are aware, there are substantial similarities between living in cities and the countryside. For instance, in terms of organizing and controlling, both these places have united by the whole apparatus of government. Besides, language seems to be the universal means of communication in which both rural and urban areas are using spontaneously. Thus, the aforementioned factors are relatively crucial associating with political concern throughout the flow of innovation today.
Despite the similarities in linguistics, laws, and as well as authorities, it is transparently clear that people settling in two places have a distinct lifestyle which becomes a leading cause of choosing where to live. The relationships, as a concrete example, define how close-knit communities the countryside has and how separated surroundings the cities are. Therefore, an ordinate amount of adults tends to abide at these tranquil and peaceful places instead of the hustle and bustle of city life.
Furthermore, a proclivity towards the modern civilization has brought cities much more differences than those small towns. The facilities and constructions have enhanced profoundly by the improvement of technology such as roads, buildings, and public services. Additionally, the variety of transportation during the twentieth century is really conducive to make citizen’s life comfortable and convenient compared to difficulties when commuting further from villages. However, although cities can supply adequately all of the incredible services to dwellers, the researchers found that there are a multitude of social problems that should not be underestimated. Dominantly, the population density has increased considerably resulting in some of the pollution such as air, water, or soil. Apart from environmental contamination, the rate of social crime has regarded a burning issue as worthy of consideration occurring in big cities.
All of this being said, there involves multiple differences while living in rural or urban areas in terms of lifestyle or modernity. Nevertheless, the commonalities in other areas, such as language and control of government cannot be ignored. Thereby, it will depend on individual preferences if residents prefer to live for the rest of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 515, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
..., although cities can supply adequately all of the incredible services to dwellers, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 737, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...has increased considerably resulting in some of the pollution such as air, water, or soil. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 449.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6859688196 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33927658354 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 176.041082164 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603563474388 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2835084186 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.65 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.45 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116997801784 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272577251909 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037042887047 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509930378716 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332239512617 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 78.4519038076 200% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.