As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
The rocketing surge of technological aid in teaching has sparked concern over whether the role of preceptors is still beneficial for society. From my perspective, people should concede the fact that no gadgets, regardless of their versatility, can replace teachers.
Although computers are omnipotent in supporting students with an abundance of useful data, they also pose certain threats. The artificial light their screens exert is predicated to be extremely detrimental, wreaking havoc on one’s eyesight. The ratio of computer users contracting myopia is on the rise; a more severe consequence derived from this is that vision-related pathologies are hereditary, which indicates that the next generation will be accompanied by glasses. Moreover, sitting in front of a computer can incentivize a sedentary lifestyle, rendering people more susceptible to diseases. Therefore, utilizing laptops or the like as a full-time alternative for teachers is implausible and deleterious.
On the other hand, pedagogues’ lessons are more vivid and interactive than those of computers. In conventional classrooms, pupils can discuss the issue with their peers face-to-face. This approach helps them absorb the contents better as well as bridge the chasm of diverse opinions of classmates. Furthermore, teachers can give students feedback about their work while man-made devices are quite futile at this task. In addition, only with their instructors may pupils share personal problems- no matter how advanced a device is, it can not fulfill the role.
In conclusion, as teachers play a focal role part in steering students into learning the right materials, computers- although multi-functional- still have a lengthy process to keep up with the dedication and wit that teachers offer, which they can never master even in the long run.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61510791367 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13390287641 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68345323741 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7381608465 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.076923077 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213887597675 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612030625933 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300026651742 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107082418891 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056695292173 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.