Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this day and age, convenience foods are increasingly widespread and it is eventually thought to take the place of customary foods and ways of food preparation. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view as I will give my two reasons below.
On the one hand, in many countries, especially in developed countries, people have to work full-time, sometimes work overtime to deal with a huge workload. Due to this issue, convenience foods such as: instant noodles, snacks or soft drinks will be chosen in order to save their time and easily satisfy their hunger. Not only workers but also students, have preferred convenience foods recently. The same as workers, most of the students are busy with assignments, some of them also work part-time to earn money hence they do not have enough time to prepare a slap-up meal and processed foods will be the best option.
On the other hand, the number of single-adult households is increasing sharply. Since they live alone, cooking is unnecessary, instead of cooking, dining out, eating ready meals or pre-packaged meals are preferred. In the past, extended families are common so cooking was seen as a chance to gather family members together. However, in today’s world, nuclear families or single-parent families are the norm of the society, therefore, cooking is not as ubiquitous as in the past.
To conclude, because of the increase of people working full-time as well as the number of single-parent families is rising, convenience foods will undoubtedly become common. I also believe that this kind of food will be a replacement for traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation in the near future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, well, kind of, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0652173913 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88893332007 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4748920031 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385397011801 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131448122442 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141853109074 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250312879662 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171769988482 0.056905535591 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.