Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is claimed that there are gradually more similarities among different countries in the world. People are able to find the same products in many places, which I believe is a positive advance.
To begin with, the world has become a global village, which helps to increase the level of convenience in people's lives. Particularly, they could buy anything they want that are from distinct brands all over the world in where they live. For example, there are a large number of convenient stores in Hanoi such as Circle K or Vinmart+, where the residents can purchase food from Korea or Japan easily without going to a supermarket. On the other hand, before these stores were constructed, people had to find a shopping centre or a portable shop that was far from their home to buy imported products. It is clear that the development mentioned in the introduction could help people save time while shopping.
However, some people still claim that this advance can have a negative outcome which is cultural assimilation. They may believe that the increase in similarities among countries could lead to the gradual loss of culture. But I argue that this development would be a great chance for many countries to popularise their own customs to the world as a way of expressing national pride. For instance, nowadays, many countries have restaurants that serve a really famous dish of Vietnam, Pho. By this way, people around the world can try this food and learn about Vietnam, also a part of its food culture. Clearly, the advance in globalisation is not as bad as many people think.
In conclusion, it is an undeniable fact that globalisation has revolutionised the whole world. Although some people still doubt this development, I am of the opinion that this trend is beneficial for all consumers, sellers as well as countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...where they live. For example, there are a large number of convenient stores in Hanoi such as Circ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing to a supermarket. On the other hand, before these stores were constructed, pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, really, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94822006472 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78314141626 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569579288026 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6309272004 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28419469624 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876368888382 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594987019325 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175400675087 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968243330668 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.