Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is often said that countries are becoming much more similar because citizens can have the same items anywhere in the world. Although there are some drawbacks of owning the same products, I think that there are far more benefits.
The main drawback of buying the same products is that it is affecting domestic companies. Due to the fact that people tend to spend on foreign goods instead of domestic goods because of its quality and convenience. Consequently, the revenue of domestic companies is affected by the competition with other foreign business. For instance, in my country, a report last month wrote that the unemployment rate is increasing significantly because domestic businesses cannot compete with goods outside the country. As a result, they have to reduce the number of labors, cutting down material sources to maintain their business. If this trend continues, a lot of companies have to face bankruptcy.
Despite the negatives mentioned above, I believe that it is a positive development of buying the same product anywhere for various reasons. Firstly, it allows citizens to use durable products to support the career since officers are able to approach new technologies at the workplace to enhance work performance effectively. Therefore, they can earn a lot of money to support their life and the economic country as well. Moreover, domestic companies can use technologies from foreign products to upgrade their products. Thus, they can produce various goods with the same quality but less expensive than competitors. Finally, this is a chance to start a new business by using those domestic products to create a lot of jobs.
In conclusion, while I recognize the possible disadvantages of buying the same products anywhere in the world, I consider it to be a positive development overall.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22184300341 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.882288427 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552901023891 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0893739238 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338338351555 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100394922802 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117073471845 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220513877161 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108739938731 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.