A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
[8/12, 9:04 AM] Kiran Patel: It is undeniable that world has become global village. Owing to blender if various nationalities and cultures, it can help a country to advancements in social and economical aspects. Despite of having some issues with this approach, in my opinion, I completely agree with that amalgamation of cultures and nationalities can certainly develop a country's growth.
To embark on it, having more nationalities and cultural difference makes life of people more interesting and joyful. Firstly, different cultures and traditions bring more variety and choices to people. For instance, Singapore has many kinds of dishes and cuisines such as Indian, western, Italian and so on. Therefore, people of this country can enjoy various food items. And it builds good harmony between individuals of various regions. Due to this, it attracts more visitors from all over the world. Secondly, people can enjoy different festivals such as Christmas, Diwali, Eid and many more. Hence, social life of individuals can be boosted by celebrating various festivals. As a result, it can help to remove barriers among people who have different religions background.
Another point to consider is that achieving growth of economy of a country is by having various nationalities in workforce. In other words, different people have their own strengths and ability to perform such tasks. For example, Asians are good at maths , whereas Europeans have more technical skills. Consequently, if a country has more different nationalities, then growth of the country would be higher. In the case of the USA, having multicultural society and various nationalities is augmented economical development. As a result, the USA has become super power in the world and life standard is become high as compared to other nations.
In conclusion mixture of cultural diversity and nationalities can improve social life of folks and economic growth of a country. Thus, I believe that this trend is likely to grow and many countries would accept it in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wth of economy of a country is by having various nationalities in workforce. In ...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y is by having various nationalities in workforce. In other words, different peo...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. For example, Asians are good at maths , whereas Europeans have more technical s...
^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... and various nationalities is augmented economical development. As a result, the USA has b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...become super power in the world and life standard is become high as compared to o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31076923077 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93192488344 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550769230769 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5410531065 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196396584151 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603039706828 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575520794816 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117644188122 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267308914306 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.