A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable that world has become a global village. Owing to a blender of various nationalities and cultures, it can help a country to advancements in social and economical aspects. Despite of having some issues with this approach, in my opinion, I completely agree with that amalgamation of cultures and nationalities can certainly develop a country’s growth.
To embark on it, having more nationalities and cultural difference makes the life of people more interesting and joyful. Firstly, different cultures and traditions bring more variety and choices to people. For instance, Singapore has many kinds of dishes and cuisines such as Indian, western, Italian and so on. Therefore, people of this country can enjoy various food items. And it builds good harmony between individuals of various regions. Due to this, it attracts more visitors from all over the world. Secondly, people can enjoy different festivals such as Christmas, Diwali, Eid and many more. Hence, social life of individuals can be boosted by celebrating various festivals. As a result, it can help to remove barriers among people who have different religions background.
Another point to consider is that achieving growth of economy of a country is by having various nationalities in workforce. In other words, different people have their own strengths and ability to perform such tasks. For example, Asians are good at maths, whereas Europeans have more technical skills. Consequently, if a country has different nationalities in workforce, then growth of the country would be higher. In the case of the USA, having multicultural society and various nationalities has augmented economic development of the nation. As a result, the USA has become a superpower in the world and life standard is become high as compared to other nations.
In conclusion, a mixture of cultural diversity and nationalities can improve the social life of folks and economic growth of a country. Thus, I believe that this trend is likely to grow and many countries would accept it in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26747720365 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97836360336 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525835866261 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5863144038 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.65 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201242974283 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626512635521 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555934585057 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122211739246 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294585775822 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.