It is generally believed by many people that the boundary for creators is the major for maintaining society disciplines. From my perspective, this idea is completely flawed to the liberty in creating esthetic work and knowledge acquisition that work of master’s offer.
There are several problems that unlimited artists impact on lifespan or behavior. The first and the biggest concern relates to the possibility of religious or psychological attempt. If the ingenious who has a capability for expounding their imagination for nation is well-equipped with versus standpoint might be sprawled within enmity masterpiece. Another drawback is the intervention in social and behavioral interactions. As whole age spend almost all their time to acquire amusement in created miracle because people were born to obtain harmonious from creators' works, despite of the fact that they hardly time to have notion about meaning. The reason has limiting to do with the fact that the requirement for art toilers is not drifting apart whole independence that is just forming and expanding their ability with controlling.
Advocates of this idea might think that showing masters' piece of work might be occurred recomplated by margining, hence government should take off limitations. They also claim that the creative artists who are free as a bird the root of awakening new page in painting, music or film.
However, to my way of thinking those thoughts are rather ill-founded as the fact might be opposite. Expressing concept through a skirt like above mentioned, would be less productive and emphatic, which might lead to buffing up the skill into the highest top albeit under the pressure.Furthermore, reality has shown that many noteworthy cognoscenti's became more noteworthy of their society who was formed in their aspect while some authorities found resolution for the talented persons' not impacting to other branches of society with their creation, such as collapsing the number of religious pieces or political consequences.
In conclusion,despite the existence of some opinion in favor of this restictions, I do believe imagination would be doubled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 912, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gious pieces or political consequences.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4082278481 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94953515846 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642405063291 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5895087463 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178993742693 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524751568819 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418313790346 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100901111607 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596460686742 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.