Despite a large number of gyms, the sedentary lifestyle has become popular in today’s world. What reasons are associated with this and what are some possible solutions?
Recent decades have witnessed a growing number of gyms. However, inactive lifestyles have gained a variety of attention. This essay will discuss the main cause rationales with this issue and propose several workable remedies.
On the one hand, there are several rationales why people prefer a sedentary lifestyle. The development of technology may be the underlying cause of an inactive lifestyle. Indeed, when people want to send a letter in the past, they may need to go to the post office. But these days, they purely sign in to their social networking site account and send a message. Another reason is the increase of clerical works. In fact, the office-based professional tasks require employees to work continuously. Consequently, residents are highly susceptive to a wide range of medical conditions such as obesity or high blood pressure.
Since the phenomenon and culminate in severe and wide-ranging problems to society the government and employers should take action instantaneously to radically address them. The efficacious remedy might be the government should advertise the drawback of technology. It is true that when addicted users of technology understand its menaces on their health, they would diminish their excessive reliance and put more attention on their unhealthy lifestyle. The second effective solution is employers should encourage their employees to go short-term exercise in the middle of working hours. Indeed, when inactive workers have certain short-break in working days, this could lead them to be less sedentary and gradually conscious of the benefits of physical exercise.
In conclusion, while an inactive lifestyle can have its roots in the progress of technology and the popularity of clerical work, advertising the downside of technology and doing short-term exercise can be a feasible approach.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, second, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, in short, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48591549296 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97563337282 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.634287544 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0767830284468 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245269220619 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275057882705 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521281625746 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332151130697 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.