It is a controversial opinion that elaborating social unrests in media such as television or newspaper should be confined because of its detrimental effects on the community. While I somewhat approve that it may have certain positive consequences, I would argue that its social influences could be harmful at an alarming rate.
Describing violations diligently is likely to bring about some merits on the society. To commence with, it is undeniable that this type of illustration can facilitate other citizens to acknowledge sufficiently the way the criminals get involved in wrongdoings, especially sophisticated cases, hence render them to avoid incurring in any repetitions taken by offenders. For instance, an intimated illustration of how the robbers break into the residential houses by only a needle instead of key can be a wake-up call for people to change their physical door’s lock to a biometric one. The second upside which should be highlighted is that in particular circumstances in which the malefactors have not yet been arrested, giving details of the crimes that they have committed through social media can ease the investigation procedure. Indeed, the perpetrators might accidentally abandon their personal tangible evidence that help the TV watchers or newspaper readers easily realize the owner’s identity, thus, give a helping hand for the detection process.
Despite incontrovertible positive effects, detailed descriptions of misdeeds can ironically occur adverse consequences that exert unpleasant influences on society. Firstly, it can become a reliable source for other potential evildoers to mimic or more severe, kick-offs normal citizens to think that engage in crimes are so easy and, therefore, decide to embark on it to benefit themself. In fact, several hidden criminals may silently seek out for a novel way to proceed with their offenses and undoubtedly an elaborated illustration of violation showing on TV can be a short-cut method. Additionally, some people used to think that undertaking in a felony is extremely intricate, however, by looking onto details of crime, they might recognize that being a theft or a kidnapper to raise money is utterly simple, resulted in their real action of committing in a wrongdoing. Secondly, one of the demerits should not be underestimated is that the intimated depiction of sins, including horror images, can create negative effects on children and the elderly, who often easily be impacted. In the other words, children can be obsessed by those pictures, as such prone to cause some mental problems and on the other hand, the old people who particularly have vascular disease might have a shock that able to devastate their health conditions.
In conclusion, although there are some inevitably compelling reasons as the detailed descriptions of wrongdoings in media impacts positively on the community, I believe that it pivotal to strictly limit its promotions on TV or newspaper because of its mentioned-above disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2557.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46367521368 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17751279912 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 176.041082164 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587606837607 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 506.74238477 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8115975364 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.642857143 106.682146367 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 20.7667163134 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195904420971 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635530114657 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345375514966 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112054526615 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427442257742 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.06 50.2224549098 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 78.4519038076 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.