In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is difficult for children in remote areas in some developing countries to access to educational systems. While some people believe that proving more schools and teachers is the good way to tackle this problem, I would agree that helping students in rural cities broaden their knowledge through using computers and the Internet should be given top-priority.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why building more schools and giving more teachers for rural areas are the good way to give students in the developing countries more chance to access to the educational environment. One reason is that there is a lack of the facilities for the demands for using schools to teach and learn. If some remote communities build more schools for children, this will encourage more young people to go to schools. Furthermore, the building of facilities helps teachers in rural communities brings a convenient environment for the transmission of knowledge which allows students will be received a huge opportunity to go to schools as well as have a great education to access a world of knowledge.
On the other hand, I believe that online learning is the most appropriate method to solve the less access to education problems. In remote areas, the local children must help their parents make ends meet rather than spend all day learning in the schools. There is evidence to support the idea that proving computers and the Internet to help children to study whenever they have spare time is more beneficial. Another reason is that building more schools for children in developing countries costs a great deal of money. The lack of fund can cause interrupting students with learning.
In conclusion, although the option to helping students in developing countries access to education through providing more schools and teachers or helping students can approach online learning are advantageous in their own way, it seems to me that it is better to help people can study through the Internet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08868501529 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73030975612 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45871559633 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.6193241509 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305816426873 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109897115493 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549608263275 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190110013765 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355165527442 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.