The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
It is predicted that in some later years, a number of drivers, who control vehicles such as vans, buses or trucks will be replaced by state-of-the-art technology that allows users to transport without human's appearances. From my personal perspective, although this advancement's drawbacks are still present, its benefits prevail over the disadvantages.
In the comparison with organic drivers, automatic systems tend to be safer and more convenient. For example, during parties or big meals, people usually consume alcohol, which prevents them from driving dependably and may lead to numerous risks, such as car accidents. With the support of modern technology, users solely ought to set up their destination before drinking beer or wine, and automatic vehicles will self-regulate to drive them home without any issues. Besides, by using the GPS systems, the rate that people get lost might significantly decrease as there is fewer situation in which users misunderstand map's instructions.
Moreover, as vehicles systems are arranged to measure the ideal amount of polluted gases which will be released, it will reduce adverse impacts that are put on the surrounding environment. A number of recent researches have indicated that the amount of discharged atmosphere coming from transportation occupies a huge proportion of elements contributing to global warming. At the same time, surveys taking in locations where testing the automatic vehicles illustrate that polluted air rate considerably decreased, thanks to the accurate measurement which is installed on transportation.
To summarize, it is undeniable that a number of issues are still present, I believe that automatic vehicles should be more considered because of their apparent benefits for our life nowadays.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... From my personal perspective, although this advancements drawbacks are still presen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61567164179 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11631953224 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.8665582402 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0278503778797 0.244688304435 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0115642059883 0.084324248473 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0144954565954 0.0667982634062 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.016689586414 0.151304729494 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107998545236 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.