Clearly, management employees at organizations receive a bigger rise in salary than ordinary ones. Some people claim that this is imminent in attracting best skilled management workers. Personally, I think that such increase in salary is acceptable if a job position is worth it. However, it can also offend experts, who work at ordinary jobs. Accordingly, this essay will include arguments behind my standpoint.
On the one hand, the value off usual workers is essential in an organization, because it is their works that will be offered and sold to customers. That is why, one should heed their salary to be reasonably high prior to what their job is and how they work. Otherwise, quality of the company's product reduces and it may lose consumers and brand name. For example, an underpaid worker is less willing to do his best in job. Moreover, noticeably less increase in salary discriminates and offends common, but expert labors. Consequently, these employees resign and employers would have to hire less-experienced individuals, which would negatively result in quality.
On the contrary, the success of an organization to reach its aims is contingent to managers' talents and skills. A good example is ArsDigita, which was successful startup in web development industry, but because of lack of experienced management executives, plenty of people faced loss in 2000. So, employers need experts in management, since managers' value is core in the business and they have more duties that ordinary workers. Correspondingly, it is important to provide bigger salary for them. When they are satisfied with their income, they put more effort on their job to meet employer demands and to boost effectiveness of a company to reach success. Consequently, the company succeeds in business and flourishes as a result of proper payment for managers' job.
To summarize, some assumptions of people considering higher growth in salaries of managers to be relevant is accepted in any company. In addition, the importance of managers' job makes it sure that they should not be underpaid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'attracting the best'.
Suggestion: attracting the best
...e people claim that this is imminent in attracting best skilled management workers. Personally,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, i think, in addition, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23652694611 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02462937812 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.462123678 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0526315789 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20465479609 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625854129014 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517064163348 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122910929316 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686015401357 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.