Disruptive school students have negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobidient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Disruptive school students have negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobidient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, more and more students are becoming too aggressive or noisy to focus in class. Some people hold the view that such student should be educated separately in order not to affect others. I totally disagree with the view for a couple of reasons.
First of all, it is in term of psychological and mental issues. As a matter of fact, those students can feel isolated or discriminated when they are put in a special class, which can lead to rebellious actions. It can be a serious impact on their development of personality at the present and their later life.

For this reason, another educational method should be taken into consideration. Without a doubt, if the schools have stricter disciplines and rules, students may follow them. For example, when a studen makes a big mistake or behaves badly, they will be punished by those strict rules such as doing the community services at certain time or their parents will be invited to school or even finishing a great deal of homework. Thus, this method with care from teachers will turn those stubborn students into the better ones, according to many studies.

To sum up, those naughty students negatively affect others. Indeed, disciplines and rules from schools help them in a positive way. Iam still convinced that a mixed class of students with both good and bad behaviours should be applied in all school in the hope of achieving better results.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 114, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...plines and rules from schools help them in a positive way. Iam still convinced that a mixed class...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, still, thus, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88333333333 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61245680453 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8494703911 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1538461538 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247262975117 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834067379052 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553912333624 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146594112712 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581963201479 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.