Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before.
Modern technology has been capturing significant public attention in recent decades due to its implications on social living standards. Given the suggestion that those technological advancements have increased the amount of users’ leisure time, I totally agree.
From communication perspective, before the appearance of mobile phones and computers, delivering a message or phone calls from one place to another would require considerable physical travels, costing unnecessary time, money and effort. By using those devices, individuals could communicate to others regardless of their locations wirelessly, thereby saving a great amount of leisure time.
From manual work perspective, the application of state-of-the-art technologies especially computer or artificial intelligence-based devices is proved to reduce or even release users from the burden of manual work, saving remarkable spare time. For example, many families have a penchant for installing smart home technologies functioning by human voice recognition process, supervising and control every house appliance without any humans’ physical interaction and attention, which would enable users to gain a great deal of free time.
From consumer consumption perspective, due to technological developments leading to the higher internet usage rate, the explosion of online shopping ensue. This means that consumers could rejoice various shopping options from different websites with relative price comparison of a product without physical travels since the ordered products would be immediately shipped to users’ desired locations through logistics services, which consequently could increase much leisure time.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that the amount of leisure time of humans has risen due to modern technology. Therefore, governments should inject more monetary investments into technological research projects to incentivise the advancements to guarantee the betterment of social living standards.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25090909091 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23660060419 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672727272727 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.1755576023 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.9 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194526139791 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843099525931 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598112628874 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116229291262 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633373191206 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.0946893788 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 10.23 50.2224549098 20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.27 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.46 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.