Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, e-mails or telephone calls
Use specific reasons and details to support your answer
Nowadays, thanks to the development of modern technology, people have used many kinds of communication as an alternative to face-to-face communication. Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly believe that face to face communication is still the most effective way to have a conversation with other people.
First and foremost, there is no denying that this type of communication is capable of creating more motivations. For example, whenever you congratulate or thank somebody, you had better express your feelings directly by means of smiling at them, showing your admiration or your gratitude in person for their achievements.
Furthermore, not only does it can help people have more productive confabulation, it also diminishes the risks of misunderstanding. Rather than sending an email or letter which can be misunderstood, misread or perceived by another person, individuals will have more opportunities to explain and convey their messages personally. Therefore, face to face communication can minimize the venture of miscommunication compared to other types.
Last but not least, it is much better to utilize face-to-face communication to build a close bond among many people. Having an unmediated meeting together can help people to have more chances to build a rapport which is never felt through emails, letter, and social media. This genre of communicating can make it easier for everyone to build camaraderie, credibility and trust in the relationship and also generate a collaborative environment, inspire a positive emotional interaction between two people.
To sum up, I strongly claim that everyone should have face to face communication to get an efficacious discussion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to get an efficacious discussion.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64566929134 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5199316442 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625984251969 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6633020331 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.363636364 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266003247413 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114317479848 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802760650074 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156773339454 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448002585851 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.