Do you think the advantages of travelling by car outweigh the disadvantages?
Over the last two decades, cars have become more and more commonly-used as the main transportation for most families. The issue of employing cars whether generates more benefits or drawbacks has consequently been a topic of much concern. From my point of view, this trend is considerably more advantageous than it is harmful.
First and foremost, it is undeniable that the large number of cars currently utilized partly causes an environmental problem. The exhaust fume ejected from cars’ engine is one of the waste products affecting the environment in certain aspects. For instance, the air pollution becomes prevalent leading to widespread environmental ramifications around the world. This also engenders a rise in global temperatures resulting in the severe weather. On the other hand, industrial and domestic wastes are the main factors contributing the rapid deterioration of the environment. Whereas it is difficult to find a perfect solution, there are several ways to ease the situation like fuel-efficient cars or reducing the number of non-essential trip. In short, despite the seriousness, this issue can be controlled by raising people’s awareness.
However, the following merits could outweigh the disadvantages. At first, it does not take people much time to get to the destination they need while waiting for the public transports would probably kill their precious time. Furthermore, it would be much easier to schedule plans flexibly. To be more specific, unplanned appointments would be easily settled as long as the transportation is under control. Ultimately, cars are the safest vehicles on the road since the developers focus on the customers’ safety to compete with each other. By and large, as long as being used effectively, cars are undoubtedly beneficial, especially in terms of safety and convenience.
In conclusion, the advantages far surpass its shortcomings. With the development of technology, cars will probably bring about more advancements and benefits for people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in short, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55987055016 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28432250732 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650485436893 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8225720297 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11131264232 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034046436915 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286025832767 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700117369742 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154351999159 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.