Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products.
The effect of Over packaging on consumer which was always debatable has now become more controversial .The substantial influence Over packaged product has sparked the controversy over the recent years. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion that consumers should avoid over packed products while others consider consumers should not avoid over packed products. This essay will elaborate both positive and negative effects of over packaging and thus will lead to logical conclusions.
At the outset there are numerous reasons in favour of over packaging from manufacturer but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, product producers try to attract consumer in many ways by over packaging. For example, in case of some biscuits packs we can see that the biscuits are placed in small plastic tray and covered with multiple layers of packets. In terms of keeping these sorts of products intact and fresh, it is sometimes necessary to use over packaging. In these cases manufacturer would show reasons that they are over packing products for the sake of customers’ benefit. From this regards, it seems logical that the customer should make informed decision whether or not to buy products that use over packing.
Nevertheless some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that over packaged products should be avoided because manufacturers are deceiving customer by over packing their products. All the packaging costs are directly being added to the consumers and they have to spend more than the value of products. Moreover, the manufacturers often use non-disposable wrappers and packets, which add bad effects to the environmental.
From what we have discussed above it can be concluded that extra packaging of products has detrimental effect to the society; however as far as I am concern consumers should avoid over packing product to solve negative effects it possessed to them and to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...atable has now become more controversial .The substantial influence Over packaged ...
^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...able has now become more controversial .The substantial influence Over packaged pro...
^^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...cessary to use over packaging. In these cases manufacturer would show reasons that th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e sake of customers' benefit. From this regards, it seems logical that the cust...
^^^^
Line 2, column 686, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... customer should make informed decision whether or not to buy products that use over packing. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... buy products that use over packing. Nevertheless some people adopt an opposing view and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28846153846 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77840804815 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560897435897 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9973957627 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443445087326 0.244688304435 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163586308613 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120575083723 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291226880498 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580838235459 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.