Doing volunteer work is a waste of time and shouldn’t be encouraged among students. Do you agree or disagree with this idea?
Nowadays, volunteer work has been considered as an integral part of many students’ life, whereas, it is sometimes claimed that students should not squander their time on doing these activities which may have negative effect on their academic results. Nonetheless, I totally believe that volunteer work ought to be encouraged in students due to its potential benefits.
To commence with, there is no denying that pupils will be able to reap a plethora of merits from doing volunteer work. Initially, it is certainly true volunteer work is an indispensable extracurricular activity in school with the aim of helping foster independence and imparting the ability to deal with different situations. In addition, students will be able to get into touch with the real world, and be equipped with many momentous soft skills for the future such as communications, teamwork, or creativity.
Furthermore, it is apparent that doing volunteer work is an efficacious way to make a contribution to the society. In spite of the young age, volunteer work makes it possible for students to fulfill their obligations to make a difference and change the environment around in a proactive way. This plays a crucial role in the cognitive development of students, which can help diminish the enormous number of criminals and social evils each year. Therefore, not only does it make students instill their consciousness of the community but it also exerts a positive impact on the development of the society.
In summary, I strongly believe that engaging in unpaid work needs to be stimulated in students owing to its benefits to both individuals and society as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proactive way" with adverb for "proactive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rence and change the environment around in a proactive way. This plays a crucial role in the cogni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pact on the development of the society. In summary, I strongly believe that enga...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, whereas, in addition, in summary, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19776119403 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07700784493 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1260014718 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.3 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258508540385 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101581919317 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596007567867 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140311563102 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595242049613 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.