Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that the developments of technology in the early period has more positive effects on human’s life than the recent ones. Personally, I totally disagree with this opinion because both of those have equally beneficial changes for humanity.
On the one hand, the early technological developments make the first steps, changing completely people’s life. For instance, the invention of computers and internet bring new methods of using, archiving and sharing via the global network which allows us to quickly access the lager information in any sort of fields. Another breakthrough device that becomes indispensable for each person is the smartphone. Its appearance makes a revolution in communication ways such as online meetings, group video conferences, enabling people in the word to connect with each other regardless of the geographical barrier. Besides, mobiles can be used in various functions as a camera, an Mp3 player and so on.
On the other hand, I assert that recently cutting-edge technology is striving to cover every aspect of life, bringing more benefit than ever. One of a milestone of the technological revolution is the development of artificial intelligence which can predict what a user type, ask, search and do. For example, Google assistant which is an app in the smartphone, can help us arrange appointments, search the direction or even interact and respond to some simple requires. In the health perspective, today, there are some machines were invented to diagnose diseases with higher precision than human, so that the risk of wrong predictions will reduce considerably.
In conclusion, the impacts of early technological advancements in our life are undisputed, however, I do believe that it definitely cannot outweigh the huge benefits coming from the recent technologies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 677, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... used in various functions as a camera, an Mp3 player and so on. On the other ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46126760563 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13054903087 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661971830986 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3984701811 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329478450132 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115253894144 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129575425597 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204055538275 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681730311734 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.