Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments
To what extend do you agree or disagree.
It would be argued that the first stage of technological inventions gave people more chance to convert their lives than recent inventions. I do not totally agree with this opinion.
First of all, It is certainly true that the early development in technology contributed a huge part of progress. These technological developments allowed people to do things that they had not thought that they could do before. It considered as a magic in this time. For an example, printing technology developed had a huge impact on the way people approach knowledge and information. It helped people to save their time on process of establishing books and newspapers in the absolutely easier way, instead of copying by hand, printers replaced human. It also meant that books, news and documents became accessible to many people. Another significant invention in the past is telephone, telephone was a revolutionised communication. It is possible for people staying far away to keep in touch with each other. Thus, early technological development changed the globe successfully.
On the other hand, while I accept that the first term of technological industry had an enormous effect on the world, I still believe that recent developments also have done the same things. For an obvious instance, cell phones today totally replaced the landline telephone in the past because of its portable and convenience. People can bring phone to everywhere, not only at home like it used to be. Furthermore, social medias such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat shows their powerful of new technology. It is not only millions but also billions people using these apps. They provide users many advantage services and the life seems to be easier than ever. For example, people can do shopping online through social networking, learn on many online system.
In conclusion, people can say that early technological developments may be seen as the foundation of recent developments but they can not insist that whether it is stronger than the recent progress.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21165644172 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9637823463 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5711917838 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4210526316 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308289207358 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835232251103 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761614800812 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207866679083 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620218376486 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.