Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? - 3
In many nations around the world, promoting an educational background for the young citizens is really vital. Nevertheless, some consider that the authority’s budget need to be used more for the adult not having the abilities of reading and writing skills. Although there are some arguments for this view, I strongly believe that more money should allocate for the young.
The main reason why the adult inhabitants that are illiterate need financial supports from the government is that this creates a favorable condition to increase the literacy rate in society. As a result, those who in this group before are likely to seek a job to earn a living, including becoming blue-collar workers as bus drivers, cleaners. Therefore, they might gradually stable their lives as well as not committing crimes to make money for their basis needs, which brings the safety for society. Thus, it is justifiable for supporters of the view that money should be expended for the illiterate.
However, I am of the opinion that the government funding must be spent more on younger population due to the chief benefit in terms of the economic perspective. With the intensive globalization around the world, all nations, these days, need to be reliant on the knowledge-based economy to exist and develop sustainably. Therefore, younger generations should be the first priority for this policy. Specifically, there should be much large amounts of money invested for teaching and learning tools or providing scholarships for poor pupils having a knack for mathematics or foreign languages even from the primary level. If this strategy is applied effectively, the economic development of a country will gain more success in the future.
In conclusion, while it is necessary to support for illiterate adults from the state funds, I hold with the view that more money should be invested for younger inhabittants.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24262295082 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92204550032 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3316267522 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284555946824 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105592094529 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065732677261 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187683013356 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598670237686 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.