Entertainment or leisure activities should be subsidized by the government.To what extend do agree or disagree?
Nowadays given to people's stressful lifestyle, there is a pressing need to spend some time for entertainment and recreational activities. While it may first appear to be just individual's responsibility to consider subject, I personally believe that this area needs to be supported financially by the government.
There is no denying the fact that the available budget in a country should be primarily allocated to public services and some key infrastructure projects such as transportation system, healthcare, and education just to name. The reason why this is assumed, is that mentioned basic needs, in fact, determine the quality of people's lives. For example, does not the government spend adequate money on hospitals, the health of their society may decline. Similarly, this also occurs about educational institutions. In this perspective, something like leisure activities are placed in lower degree of importance and actually these are inhabitants who are responsible for supplying required money in this field.
However, this does not mean that entertainment should be completely neglected. To begin, allocating budget to promote somewhere such as sports center, swimming pools, beaches, public libraries, zoological gardens and so on is not only entertaining, but also can be a rich source of earning money. For instance, preparing unique facilities near the sea can persuade tourist to be there. As a consequence, new job opportunities will be created for residents living there. Moreover, it is claimed that stress, which is the main reason for many diseases among particularly young people, can be relieved by implementing leisure activities. In other words a small amount of money subsidized for recreational activities leads to saving an enormous amount from health care sector in the near future.
In conclusion, numerous benefits can be gained from financial help in entertainment and leisure activities. It is highly recommended that governments around the world take subject into account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...s. While it may first appear to be just individuals responsibility to consider subject, I p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58306188925 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15638372597 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631921824104 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0501278701 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.266666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169093034754 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542856318491 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479337784675 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102033585624 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278603931793 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.