Every year several languages die out every year. Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier when there are fewer languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The phenomenon in which fewer languages are used has been observed all over the world. While some people believe in the impact of each language on life, others support the idea that this brings more advantages. This essay will discuss both views and offer my opinion.
There are several advantages of reduced languages. The most tangible one could be more efficient communication. While communication is key to many other aspects in life, it can be seen quite clearly in aiding the flow of goods and business thus improving the international economy. Besides financial benefits, fewer language situations may play a role in reinforcing relationships between countries. By breaking language barriers, different countries can avoid misunderstandings. In brief, it might be true that a limited number of languages can drive wealth and relations.
On the other hand, supporters argue that languages dying out might result in many more consequences. Not only languages are the means of communication but they also carry crucial values. For instance, when people stop speaking a certain language, plenty of cultural differences and unique knowledge which is acquired by that language’s users are likely to be lost. Furthermore, the lack of language variety probably leads to the dominance of a few popular languages. This can be considered unfair for countries where lost languages originate. More importantly, this phenomenon may lead to extreme difficulties for schools and parents in raising children. Without a native language identified, it’s almost impossible to teach kids about their national identity, tolerance, and understandings of differences. Every language is important because of the cultural and educational values it holds within.
Overall, dying out languages can be beneficial in some cases but as a whole, this has unarguable consequences for humankind. Therefore, I disagree with the mentioned opinion. From my perspective, measures should be taken appropriately to protect less common yet valuable languages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect less common yet valuable languages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in brief, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60517799353 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12218411376 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647249190939 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7872533173 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.45 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317267380592 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879307779626 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511728279483 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185377395786 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350904066722 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.