It is true that several languages are disappearing every year and people have the views that fewer languages would be better for their daily lives. While I agree with the views that the complex languages disappear could be easier for us, I also believe that a language fading out means the culture of a community disappears, therefore it is crucial to protect certain languages.
On the one hand, more people tend to use the major languages such as English, Chinese and Spanish etc. and give up to use the less common languages in the globe. This situation means that we can interact with each other easier and it is beneficial to the international development between countries. For example, some countries in remote area begin to develop the infrastructures with the international non-governmental organization due to the breaking down the obstacle in communication. Furthermore, more children use the popular languages as their mother tongues, and thus they can acquire more opportunities to study or work in other countries.
On the other hand, the dying out of rare languages is harmful to the conservation of the traditional culture and custom. Firstly, a language represents the wisdom of a community, many local cultures like traditional songs and folk stories are developed base on the languages. Those valuable cultures cannot pass to the next generation if the local language disappeared. Secondly, languages disappear will increase the difficulty of tracing the historical history of certain societies as many historical records are recorded by the unique and systematic domestic languages. Finally, the loss of a language will cause the generation gap between youngers and adults in communities. The communication barriers between people may even lead to the collapse of the society.
In conclusion, I can understand why people argue that it is convenient to interact if there are fewer languages, but it seems to me that it is important to protect any kinds of language.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25705329154 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06128863302 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6485860766 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.785714286 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277912201345 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874788349001 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057183354619 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150976286527 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722560639574 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.